Helping You Connect the Dots to Succeed Faster
WGAN-TV: Now Playing
WGAN-TV: Now Playing
Get access to the We Get Around Network Map of Matterport Pro3 Service Providers – and permission to post Help Wanted ads in the We Get Around Network Forum.
Join WGAN Help Wanted Marketing Partner
MSP? Get on the WGAN Pro3 Map
A Service of We Get Around Network (not affiliated with Matterport).
One Order  |  One Quote  |  One Contact
Book Multiple GLOBAL Commercial Locations
  • ✔  As-Builts
  • ✔  Construction Progress
  • ✔  Facilities Management
Last 24 Hours: 504 Unique Visitors
9,354 WGAN Members in 149 Countries
Last 30 Days: 19,717 Page Views | 9,664 Unique Visitors | 11 New Members
We Get Around Network Forum
Quick Start | WGAN Forum
360Google Street ViewGSV

Blur faces GSV8287

Bryan private msg quote post Address this user
Hi,

i am having some troubles publishing a Matterport tour to gsv.

I have to blur out faces in just 5 360's. But when i use the option when uploading the tour it also blurs out the faces of a wall painting.


When i upload the tour on gsv trough matterport they automatically go straight online on gsv and not in the private folder so there is no more option to just blur out the faces that needs to be blured out.

Anyone who can help me out?
Post 1 IP   flag post
WGAN
Standard
Member
Bon Secour, Alabama
Chemistrydoc private msg quote post Address this user
I've had a similar issue once before.

I basically downloaded a 360 snapshot from every camera position, manually blurred the ones that need blurring, then recreated the tour using Cupix, publishing to GSV through them.

It's tedious, but Matterport doesn't leave many options here.

Hysterical that the Matterport algorithm detects cartoon faces as faces!

Best Luck -

Keith
Post 2 IP   flag post
Gladsmuir private msg quote post Address this user
Hi Bryan,
As a long serving GSV pro can I say that in the early days Google were fanatical about blurring faces.
In reality they care very little any more.
If the faces belong to staff or people who have no objection to being shown, then I personally would not bother with blurring.
Oliver
Post 3 IP   flag post
WGAN Forum
Founder &
WGAN-TV Podcast
Host
Atlanta, Georgia
DanSmigrod private msg quote post Address this user
@Bryan

This WGAN Forum discussion may be of interest to you:

Matterport Face Blurring (Beta) versus CUPIX Blurring: Which do you prefer?

@Chemistrydoc

Wow! That's a workaround (that should not be necessary).

Happy Thanksgiving,

Dan
Post 4 IP   flag post
105396 4 4
This topic is archived. Start new topic?