Question RE: Confirmation of whether its a Pro 1 or Pro 2 scan9974
Pages:
1
Regina, Saskatchewan Canada |
Queen_City_3D private msg quote post Address this user | |
| Does any one know if there's a way to confirm what type of camera was used on a scan after it has been completed? We recently had opportunity to refer out a project to another MSP and I asked prior to the scan if they had the Pro1 or Pro 2 Camera. They said they had the Pro 2, but I have my suspicions that they used a Pro1 as I'm used to more clarity and crisper edges on walls and furniture then what I am seeing. Might just be in my mind though, so I'm wondering if there's any way to tell. Perhaps based on the model # or something? |
||
| Post 1 • IP flag post | ||
 WGANStandard Member Bon Secour, Alabama |
Chemistrydoc private msg quote post Address this user | |
| There has to be a way based on pixel density..... | ||
| Post 2 • IP flag post | ||
|
Regina, Saskatchewan Canada |
Queen_City_3D private msg quote post Address this user | |
@Chemistrydoc I'm sure you're right; however, I wouldn't even know how to go about testing that!  I was hoping there'd be some clue if I inspect the page source details, but that html language is all greek to me. |
||
| Post 3 • IP flag post | ||
 WGAN FanCLUB Member Coeur d'Alene, Idaho |
lilnitsch private msg quote post Address this user | |
| Matterport’s support could probably tell you. On mobile devices it’s hard to tell the difference | ||
| Post 4 • IP flag post | ||
|
WGAN Standard Member Bon Secour, Alabama |
Chemistrydoc private msg quote post Address this user | |
| Can you access the model in workshop? If so, capture some 2D photos. Capture some from a known Pro2 model of similar content. Compare pixel counts / dpi in Properties. | ||
| Post 5 • IP flag post | ||
|
WGAN Fan CLUB Member Coeur d'Alene, Idaho |
lilnitsch private msg quote post Address this user | |
| @Queen_City_3D reach out to support@matterport.com with the tour link they should be able to tell you what it was shot on | ||
| Post 6 • IP flag post | ||
|
Regina, Saskatchewan Canada |
Queen_City_3D private msg quote post Address this user | |
| @lilnitsch I'll email them and see if they can tell me. @Chemistrydoc Yes... the model was transferred to me. Good idea... I'll compare a snapshot at 100% taken in this model with one at 100% taken with my own camera. |
||
| Post 7 • IP flag post | ||
|
WGAN Fan CLUB Member Coeur d'Alene, Idaho |
lilnitsch private msg quote post Address this user | |
| @Queen_City_3D I shot our real estate office on all the supported cameras except the blk. The Insta360 & theta V are pretty easily spotted as lessor cameras but the Z1, Pro1, & Pro2 take a little pixel peeping on the desktop to really tell the difference | ||
| Post 8 • IP flag post | ||
|
Regina, Saskatchewan Canada |
Queen_City_3D private msg quote post Address this user | |
| Here's the pixel test: The details from a snapshot taken at 100% sizing from the model transferred to us from their camera:  And details from a snapshot taken from one of our most recent scans (also taken at 100%):  Theirs is 2832 x 1593 whereas ours is 5664 x 3186. I think it would be safe to say theirs is not a Pro 2.... am I right? |
||
| Post 9 • IP flag post | ||
|
WGAN Standard Member Bon Secour, Alabama |
Chemistrydoc private msg quote post Address this user | |
Yep! Pretty much what it should be (remembering that Pro2 is "4K" |
||
| Post 10 • IP flag post | ||
|
WGAN Fan CLUB Member Coeur d'Alene, Idaho |
lilnitsch private msg quote post Address this user | |
Our 6k just showed up today.  |
||
| Post 11 • IP flag post | ||
|
Regina, Saskatchewan Canada |
Queen_City_3D private msg quote post Address this user | |
| @lilnitsch Nice camera! Do you plan to take video with it as well? | ||
| Post 12 • IP flag post | ||
|
WGAN Fan CLUB Member Coeur d'Alene, Idaho |
lilnitsch private msg quote post Address this user | |
| @Queen_City_3D indeed that is BlackMagic’s wheel house. It’s a 6k cinema camera | ||
| Post 13 • IP flag post | ||
|
inmerso3D private msg quote post Address this user | |
Quote:Originally Posted by Queen_City_3D I think this works: 1-Enter to the tour 2-You stop at any point 3-Zoom out completely with the mouse wheel 4-Start to zoom in with the mouse wheel slowly to count the "clicks" of zoom in until the end 5-If the tour was done with a Pro 1, it only allows 12 "zoom clicks" approx. If the tour was done with a Pro 2, it allows 23 "zoom clicks" approx. |
||
| Post 14 • IP flag post | ||
|
Regina, Saskatchewan Canada |
Queen_City_3D private msg quote post Address this user | |
| @inmerso3D I'll have to try that out. The pixel count was pretty much the evidence I needed, but Matterport support was able to confirm that it was done with a PRO 1. We brought that to the attention of the sub-contractor and they apologized and to their credit are going to re-scan with the newer camera as per our agreement (they had both in their inventory). |
||
| Post 15 • IP flag post | ||
|
|
inmerso3D private msg quote post Address this user | |
Quote:Originally Posted by Queen_City_3D Congratulations for solving the problem. I also believe that pixel counting works best as evidence. The "zoom cliks" I think serves to have a quick idea of the type of camera as a visitor of the tour without being a user of the workshop. This topic was interesting. Regards! |
||
| Post 16 • IP flag post | ||
Pages:
1This topic is archived. Start new topic?