Matterport Versus immoviewer5697
Pages:
1
 WGAN ForumFounder & WGAN-TV Podcast Host Atlanta, Georgia |
DanSmigrod private msg quote post Address this user | |
| Hi All, Have you used Matterport and immoviewer? How would you compare the two? If you looked at both solutions - and picked one - which one and why? Best, Dan |
||
| Post 1 • IP flag post | ||
|
JakeRees private msg quote post Address this user | |
| What Up @dansmigrod, I don't personally use immoviewer, but I work as a consultant with a company who does. Cons: My biggest issue with immoviewer is the lack of a true structure behind it like Matterport or Realvision provide- They have gotten way way better than when I first looked at their product, but it still needs some tweaks in my opinion. Next would be the load time to move from scene to scene. Maybe I'm impatient being a millennial and all, but it seems rather drawn out compared to other systems. Pros: Cheap rig set up and very cost effective. You could have 4 rigs w/ hosting for years for the cost of 1 MP. Simple to shoot. Can offer 360 video without addition equipment thanks to the theta. Can shoot google trusted very simply - again thanks to the theta I think for know I will stick with my trusty dslr and fisheye- But as tech continues to improve i think the 360 camera will take over just because of the speed factor. 2 second vs 60 second capture will be a major factor |
||
| Post 2 • IP flag post | ||
Frisco, Texas |
Metroplex360 private msg quote post Address this user | |
| I'd use Cupix over Immoviewer if I was not using Matterport. | ||
| Post 3 • IP flag post | ||
Pages:
1This topic is archived. Start new topic?