New Blog: MPEmbed vs. MPSkin: Choosing the Right Tool for Matterport Tours20542
Pages:
1
 WGAN FanClub Member Suisun City, California |
ScanYourSpace private msg quote post Address this user | |
| Using Chatgpt I created this blog entry comparing MPembed to MPskin. I'd love to get some thoughts from those who have used both. I've used MPEmbed but haven't used MPSkin yet. MPEmbed vs. MPSkin: Choosing the Right Tool for Matterport Tours |
||
| Post 1 • IP flag post | ||
Bochum, Germany |
framedivision private msg quote post Address this user | |
| Ermmmmm... Although I have not read the article completely I guess your Blogpost needs some revisions, @ScanYourSpace. For example you just cannot host MPskin enhanced Matterport Spaces independently from Matterport's and MPskin's server infrastructure (i. e. definitely NOT "standalone" ). There are indeed some advanced features in MPskin (e. g. injection of own JavaScript, CSS and HTML), but others do not require any coding and are very accessible. I have the impression you (or ChatGPT) are not writing about MPskin - which really is not that different from MpEmbed in many regards - but perhaps about 3DVista. Really, this can be quite misleading and I guess MPskin would probably NOT be happy with this description of their platform. Best regards, Dietmar |
||
| Post 2 • IP flag post | ||
|
MeshImages private msg quote post Address this user | |
| Complete nonsense from ChatGPT. Missed key features and advantages for both products. | ||
| Post 3 • IP flag post | ||
|
WGAN Fan Club Member Suisun City, California |
ScanYourSpace private msg quote post Address this user | |
| @framedivision Thanks for the input, i'm definitely going to do some more research into both. Like I said, i have used mpembed and haven't used mpskin. @meshimages have you used both? if so i'd love some input on the difference and which one you'd recommend. tom |
||
| Post 4 • IP flag post | ||
|
|
MeshImages private msg quote post Address this user | |
| @ScanYourSpace Sure, I also used an AI for this. My question was: "MPSkin and MPEmbed - both are Matterport SDK Overlays - please create a list of features and compare both systems. Can you finally make a recommendation." Answer: MPSkin and MPEmbed are both Matterport SDK overlays that enhance the functionality and customization options for Matterport virtual tours. Let's compare their features and capabilities: ## Feature Comparison "MESH IMAGES: I may add the following comments to this chart: - MPEMbed has a great implementation of Virtual Staging but none for AR - MPSkin has great Mini Map features and integrates with latest Google Analytics - MPEmbed is also offering a WhiteLabel version - Both solutions are offering extended VR capabilities"  ## MPSkin Highlights - Developed by experienced Matterport users[1] - Enables easy customization of virtual tours[1] - Offers a wide range of features for enhancing Matterport tours[3] - Provides multilingualism, menu customization, and branding options[3] - Includes augmented reality and virtual staging capabilities[3] - Reduces post-processing time with a user-friendly CMS[3] - Used in over 66 countries with more than 62 million visitors[3] ## MPEmbed Highlights - Official Matterport SDK Development Partner since 2018[4] - Offers both free and premium versions[4] - Provides a set of essential features in the free version[4] - Premium version allows for more advanced customization[4] - Offers custom design services for tailored solutions[4] - Has been used to customize over 100,000 Matterport experiences[4] ## Recommendation Both MPSkin and MPEmbed offer valuable features for enhancing Matterport virtual tours. The choice between the two depends on your specific needs and preferences: Choose MPSkin if: - You require advanced features like augmented reality and virtual staging - You want a solution developed by experienced Matterport users - You need a highly customizable platform with a wide range of features Choose MPEmbed if: - You want access to a free version with essential features - You're looking for an official Matterport SDK Development Partner - You need custom design services for tailored solutions Ultimately, both platforms offer robust solutions for enhancing Matterport tours. MPSkin appears to have more advanced features, while MPEmbed offers a free version and custom design services. Consider testing both platforms to determine which best suits your specific requirements and workflow. Citations: [1] https://matterport.com/industries/case-studies/mpskin-partners-matterport-help-hospitality-and-tourism-clients-customize [2] https://matterport.github.io/showcase-sdk/sdk_quickstart.html [3] https://www.mpskin.com/en/ [4] https://mpembed.com [5] https://www.mpskin.com/en/features/advanced-tag-features/ [6] https://matterport.com/industries/case-studies/how-mpembed-doubled-premium-users-matterport-platform-tools |
||
| Post 5 • IP flag post | ||
 WGAN ForumFounder & WGAN-TV Podcast Host Atlanta, Georgia |
DanSmigrod private msg quote post Address this user | |
| Text Me 5 Minutes Before WGAN-TV is Live | WGAN-TV | How to Create and Use ChatGPT and GPTs to Help Real Estate Photographers Write | Guest: [b]Scan Your Space (a Division of Sparks Media Group) Founder and CEO Tom Sparks | Wednesday, 12 December 2024 | Episode: 233 | www.ScanYourSpace.com | www.SparksMediaGroup.com | @SparksMediaGroup @MeshImages Thank you for also including your prompt. That's awesome! You might enjoy watching this WGAN-TV Live at 5 show -- live -- today, Wednesday, 11 December 2024 -- on the WGAN-TV YouTube Channel (or above). Happy holidays, Dan |
||
| Post 6 • IP flag post | ||
 WGAN StandardMember Las Vegas |
VTLV private msg quote post Address this user | |
| I just got a letter from Mpembed stating they're completely dropping the basic plan. So I plan to be dropping their service. I only use about 10 spaces. No need to pay $200 more for 90 unused spaces. Letter below: We hope this message finds you well. We're reaching out to share some important updates about your current MpEmbed Premium subscription. As you may know, the Basic plan was phased out over two years ago. While most of our customers have already upgraded to the Pro plan, a small number of users remain on the Basic plan. To better serve our users and provide access to enhanced features, we will officially retire the Basic plan in early February 2025. All remaining Basic plan users will be seamlessly upgraded to the Pro plan. What’s Included in the Pro Plan? The Pro plan, priced at $29.95 USD per month or $299.95 USD per year, offers numerous advantages, including: Increased Space Capacity: Upgrade from 25 spaces to a generous 100 spaces for your account. Access to the Media Library: Upload files such as images, MP3, MP4, CSS, GLB, and PDFs directly to our servers. Unlock advanced features, like embedding 3D objects using the “TV” functionality to place images or videos anywhere in your space. Enjoy 50 GB of media storage with your Pro subscription. White Label Domain Option: Replace "mpembed.com" with your own domain for a professional, branded experience. If you have a separate subscription for white label domains, it will now be included in the Pro plan. Live Training and Support: Get personalized Zoom training sessions with a member of our team to help you make the most of MPEmbed's features. What Happens Next? Automatic Upgrade: Your account will automatically transition to the Pro plan at the start of February 2025. No Immediate Charges for Annual Plans: If you’re on an annual plan, the new pricing will only take effect at your next renewal. If you’re satisfied with this upgrade, there’s nothing you need to do! We’re confident the Pro plan will provide you with the tools and flexibility to elevate your work. Should you have any questions or need assistance, our team is here to help. Please don’t hesitate to contact us. Thank you for being a valued MPEmbed customer. We wish you a wonderful holiday season and a happy New Year! |
||
| Post 7 • IP flag post | ||
Pages:
1