HJ: How Photographers Can Resist Zillow’s Threat To Monopolize Real Estate15250
Pages:
1
WGAN Forum Founder & WGAN-TV Podcast Host Atlanta, Georgia |
DanSmigrod private msg quote post Address this user | |
Image courtesy of HomeJab How Agents And Photographers Can Resist Zillow’s Latest Threat To Monopolize Real Estate by Joe Jesuele Founder and Owner HomeJab Reposted with permission Zillow Group, Inc., is currently pursuing a patent that would drastically change the way in which real estate content is shared and distributed online. This move is the latest in a series of patent grabs that highlights Zillow’s relentless campaign to monopolize the real estate marketplace, not to mention stifle independent agents and brokerages that wish to run their businesses unencumbered by larger corporations. To be clear, Zillow’s recent grab for power isn’t the first of its kind. Since the company’s inception in 2006, Zillow has acquired more than 20 patents that govern how real estate content can be presented to users searching on mobile and desktop. But it doesn’t end there. Zillow’s tactical approach to controlling real estate search has been so far-reaching, in fact, that they’ve even procured a Blackberry Application patent and one for the Apple TV in 2011 and 2015 respectively. What is a Patent? To better understand Zillow’s latest patent application, it’s important to know what patents are and to consider the legal ramifications behind them. According to the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), a patent is “an exclusive right granted for an invention, which is a product or a process that provides, in general, a new way of doing something, or offers a new technical solution to a problem.” Over the past few decades, numerous landmark patents have been filed to protect their intellectual properties. These innovative technologies have changed the world arguably for the better. And as the WIPO put it, they offered new technical solutions to a problem and new ways of doing something. By contrast, Zillow’s latest patent application offers no groundbreaking technologies to speak of and no innovation that would merit the government’s approval. Be that as it may, the government has already granted Zillow a swath of generic patents time and again, doing so in a manner that feels reckless and unchecked. What is Zillow’s Latest Patent Application? The abstract for Zillow’s latest patent application describes “techniques for generating and presenting a GUI (graphical user interface) [i.e. a visual way of interacting with a computer using windows, icons, and menus] on a client device that includes a computer model of the building’s interior with one or more first types of information.” One example of “first types of information” is a featured, large pane generated from a search query with additional, smaller panes complementing the information displayed in the featured pane. In graphic design, this technique is called “visual hierarchy” and has been around since the early 1900s. It’s hardly avant-garde, and yet Zillow’s generic argument over “first types of information,” namely how search results are presented in the large pane + smaller complementary panes GUI, suggests that they’re the ones to have invented it. When in reality, GUIs that feature a large pane + smaller complimentary panes, as well as “multiple user-selectable controls” (verbiage imported from one of Zillow’s recently approved patents), have been commonplace in mobile, app, and desktop searches for some time now. Zillow’s patent abstract goes on to say that this GUI “may be a 3D or 2.5D representation generated after the house is built and showing the actual house’s interior (e.g., walls, furniture, etc.), and may be displayed to a user of a client computing device in a displayed GUI with various user-selectable controls.” In other words, any 3D or 2.5D models that denote progression through the home (e.g., front door, entryway, living area, kitchen, bedroom, bathroom, and so forth) are subject to a potential lawsuit by Zillow if they are uploaded, distributed, or marketed outside of the Zillow interface. How to Keep Control of Your Real Estate Content If you’re a real estate professional, it’s important to keep exclusive control of your content. This is key to broadening your audience reach, expanding your sphere of influence, and growing your real estate business. More importantly, maintaining ownership and flexibility over your content can help you sell the home faster and win more listings. To encourage free enterprise in real estate, it’s good to remember that Zillow won’t offer you exclusive ownership and control of your content. As we pointed out in our review of the Zillow 3D app, uploading content to an independent platform that guarantees source files is in the real estate agent’s and brokerage firm’s best interests. Why? Because independent platforms keep your content malleable. That’s to say, you get to control where the 3D real estate tour is hosted and viewed. Not only will this maximize your potential to generate more leads. But you’ll also avoid a patent debacle and potential lawsuit from Zillow if the content is shared elsewhere. Sadly, real estate agents and photographers are too tempted to use Zillow’s 3D app because it’s free and gives the property a free promotion when listed. But in the long run, both agents and photographers will end up losing big if they keep handing key visual assets of the property (videos & virtual tours) to Zillow. The way to stop this brash takeover of the real estate marketplace is to avoid using Zillow’s 3D app and opt instead for a free web app that will allow real estate agents and photographers to save their properties to the Blockchain (Ethereum network.) This way, the listing agent’s name will always be attached to the property and publicly verifiable — the same goes for photographers who take pictures of the property. With their work saved to the Blockchain, credits are given to the photographers responsible for the photos. At HomeJab, we’re excited to announce that we’re currently developing this app! This is good news for real estate professionals who wish to break free of the restrictive Zillow model. After all, Zillow presents properties with no mention of the previous listing agent. Worse still, it sells leads to other agents. This is why the blockchain method of recording property is crucial: it will always keep the listing agent’s info linked to the property. Lastly, unlike Zillow, Blockchain is decentralized. This keeps the real estate industry independent — not dependent on a company whose ultimate goal is to monopolize the real estate marketplace. Source: HomeJab Blog HomeJab is a nationwide, real estate media production company that applies innovative technology and a user-friendly customer experience to make on demand, professional quality media services available to the real estate market. HomeJab’s professional videos, HDR photography, aerials and immersive 3D virtual tour services – the most comprehensive offering in terms of immersive digital media in the marketplace - can be scheduled with a professional photographer or filmmaker within the day and once shot are edited and delivered online within 24 hours making it one of the fastest most efficient media services available. --- Reprinted in its entirety with the permission of HomeJab Founder Joe Jesuele. --- What are your thoughts? |
||
Post 1 IP flag post |
WGAN Fan CLUB Member Coeur d'Alene, Idaho |
lilnitsch private msg quote post Address this user | |
Personally I do not see Zillow as a threat as a photographer while they are toying with the idea of Zillow Photo services in larger metros once you get out of the high density areas the model breaks down and no longer pencils similar to instant offers these are easier to value when you have large areas of track homes once you get out in to the less populated areas & have to start dealing with property pins, well rights along with what ever else might pop up it's not quite as appealing of an opportunity My location even Matterport's Capture Services didn't pencil just do to geography and travel times along with it's handicaps of not being able to sell additional services as a photographer Zillow is doing some interesting things these days and they are a company to keep an eye on |
||
Post 2 IP flag post |
WGAN Fan CLUB Member Coeur d'Alene, Idaho |
lilnitsch private msg quote post Address this user | |
Ricoh's new Virtual staging offering is a interesting new feature that they are now including in their tour platform: (Ricoh actually co-developed the Zillow 3D home tours app for Zillow) | ||
Post 3 IP flag post |
WGAN Fan Club Member Buffalo, New York |
GETMYVR private msg quote post Address this user | |
One day, there will be a class action lawsuit. The MLS & these real estate websites have no problem stealing our intellectual property such as images to be exploited on their website for their own profit and benefit. I predict a more independent version of the MLS will rise, simply because people are tired of monopolies controlling every facet of our life. |
||
Post 4 IP flag post |
WGAN Forum Founder & WGAN-TV Podcast Host Atlanta, Georgia |
DanSmigrod private msg quote post Address this user | |
WGAN Free Service: Text Me 5 Minutes Before WGAN-TV is Live |
||
Post 5 IP flag post |
WGAN Fan Club Member Gilroy, California |
Dataventurer private msg quote post Address this user | |
Okay, I am ready to weigh in here with my comments. It took me a couple weeks to do my research to confirm a couple things with my own Zillow 3D Home account and check in with my contact at Zillow to confirm a couple of points. Just an aside: I bet the company is regretting the choice of their company name amidst the current national foment over "the jab"... This article above and the related HomeJab blog post mentioned in the article here spends a lot of ink pointing at the specter of patent infringement attempting to create a narrative that Zillow will strip your rights to your media. The phrase used in the article “any 3D or 2.5D models that denote progression through the home are subject to a potential lawsuit by Zillow if they are uploaded, distributed, or marketed outside of the Zillow interface” sounds scary. There are a lot of things that could trigger “potential lawsuits” in our business. What’s real, though…? Here are the points raised by HomeJab in the article and the blog post that I find misleading and not the true facts: “What’s more, Zillow has primed their website to be the only place where content submitted to them can be viewed.” and “But if buyers wish to access an agent’s virtual tour, which is critical these days when time is money, then they should be able to access it on the listing agent’s website.” TRUE or FALSE? What’s real is that Zillow currently enables 3D tours created with their app to be Unbranded and shared to other platforms. I have used this function since I became a Certified 3D Home photographer last year. I paste the unbranded link from my Zillow 3D Home Tour into the Show and Tour single-page website that I create for listings and it works fine, with NO sign that it’s hosted on the Zillow platform. Proof: check out a 3D tour I created, hosted on Zillow’s platform as it is displayed within the Show and Tour web page. HomeJab: “Once files are sent to Zillow, whether accidentally or not, Zillow owns them.” TRUE or FALSE? I also know that in June, Zillow began enabling DOWNLOAD off their site of photos uploaded by the creator/photographers. I confirmed via a phone call with Dan Mudge, Zillow’s Photography Account Coordinator, that photographers retain all rights to the photos they post on Zillow directly or that get scraped by Zillow from the MLS listing where they are usually posted originally. HomeJab: “Allow us to point out that “Zillow 3D” is a misnomer. That’s to say, there’s no 3D view (whoops!)” TRUE or FALSE? I don’t understand what point they are making. I looked at their example tour which provides the same kind of visibility as the Zillow 3D tours. I see that the HomeJab example has a dollhouse view. Is HomeJab asserting that a dollhouse view must be included to qualify a virtual tour as “3D”? There have been a couple threads on this forum considering terms and how there is no industry standard specification for some of the ways immersive media has been labeled over the years. Without providing more specifics, I find HomeJab’s claim to be lacking substance. To complete my research, I applied online to become a member of HomeJab’s photographer team. My application was quickly accepted with a note that “we are expanding our service area and will contact you when we have a need”. I note that the company is based in Pennsylvania, I’m in northern California. Compared to my experience applying and being accepted as a photographer with Snappr, the Snappr process included submitting a portfolio and a live Zoom interview. The Snappr web platform and mobile app seem much more mature in their development and interface. Closing comments: I was disappointed with HomeJab’s promotional strategy. The facts are that Zillow and it’s Trulia sister-site hosted 39% of the real estate-related website traffic WORLDWIDE when I pulled some stats last summer for the month of August 2020. (910 million hits on the top 10 international sites, 355.7 million of those were to Zillow and Trulia. Source: Pro.SimilarWeb.com website performance report on September 9, 2020.) If real estate agents are not closely scrutinizing how they can optimize and leverage the kind of exposure Zillow offers for their client’s homes, they are not exercising their professional fiduciary responsibility. |
||
Post 6 IP flag post |
WGAN Forum Founder & WGAN-TV Podcast Host Atlanta, Georgia |
DanSmigrod private msg quote post Address this user | |
@Dataventurer Thank you for your research to help move this conversation forward. Looks like I will have more questions for my guest on WGAN-TV Live at 5. I am confused about: Quote: Originally Posted by @Dataventurer If I, as the photographer, own the copyright on images that I upload to Zillow: 1. Can I tell Zillow I want downloading disabled? 2. Can I tell Zillow to remove my photos once the property sells? For clarification, long after a family member sold a property, the photos are still live on Zillow. Thanks, Dan |
||
Post 7 IP flag post |
WGAN Fan Club Member Buffalo, New York |
GETMYVR private msg quote post Address this user | |
@Dataventurer which is why professional real estate photographers should be charging at least $750 minimum - minimum I said - for any photo shoot because that content is going to get stolen, reclaimed and redistributed without the copyright issuers permission. Who's protecting us? It is our content, the pro photo guys and girls which Powers the reason people look at these sites to begin with. Nobody cares about text they want to see pictures videos and 3D tours when shopping for property. I'm almost wondering if all us photographers and 3D photographers can form our own Union, and get Federal protections and legal power to challenge these big corporate elites that want to suffocate our intellectual property. |
||
Post 8 IP flag post |
WGAN Fan Club Member Gilroy, California |
Dataventurer private msg quote post Address this user | |
Hey, I just came across at attempt at defining 360 vs. 3D. I had raised an objection in my earlier post to HomeJab's "jab" at Zillow's 3D Home platform. Here are the definitions from Spencer Davis, a guy I just came across on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YCP_SOq1DDY 3D: - Most expensive, most immersive, high image quality - Can use Matterport camera (most expensive, best quality) - Or you can use high-end 360 camera with Matterport hosting service - Matterport Pro2 3D Camera, Ricoh Theta Z1, Insta360 One X 360: - Looks VERY SIMILAR to 3D tour with less freedom of movement - Still provides immersive and interactive experience - Economical option - Many 360 cameras of various qualities - Can use many hosting platforms - DSLR provides extremely high image quality (requires pano head, fisheye, and PTGui software) |
||
Post 9 IP flag post |
Expertise private msg quote post Address this user | ||
R/E photography is a tough business. It is unfortunately one of those "jobs" that people look at and say "gee that looks like fun, and I could make GREAT money!!" And if by some miracle, photo shoots were going for $750, that would just attract more no talent dreamers who would quickly drag down the value of photo shoots. Which is what's happened in the 6 years since we started at this. Although the baseline wasn't anywhere near $750! Agree 100% that photos and video do the heavy lifting for eyeballs and clicks and that Zillow without "our" photos wouldn't exist as we know it. But keep in mind, we licensed those photos to the agents "for marketing usage". Zillow would seem to be a legitimate marketing use. If you want to try to keep your agents from posting listing photos to Zillow, good luck with your business. Theoretically, real estate photographers could form a guild or association. But you could NOT in any way suggest pricing guidelines for your members. I tried to get together a county wide R/E Photographers association, with no success. A bunch of people said they were interested. My goals were modest. To make membership contingent upon a minimal level of professionalism: x amount of experience, proof of insurance and having a business license. My goals: to differentiate pros from side hustle dreamers and hacks in the hope that this would boost our "perceived value". And to present a united front at the MLS level so we could influence policy. This effort fell apart when a couple chicken little types starting cooking up scenarios where we would be financially liable if X, Y or Z happened. And then some were put off by the fact that we proposed making membership $100/year or something. R/E photogs are kinda dumb. Quote: Originally Posted by GETMYVR |
||
Post 10 IP flag post |
WGAN Fan Club Member Queensland, Australia |
Wingman private msg quote post Address this user | |
The "funny" part that we are simply being used by agents to earn more money for them doing less & less work. Do you think they really charge $100(photography fee) for property photos? No they charge their vendors $200-500 for them. Even $750 drone video including video walkthrough paid by agents appears on a bill to a vendor as $1500 media. And then they will tell you that their vendor has no marketing budget left for a Matterport tour. That guy who has made that 360 vs 3D video has another one where he explains how much he charges. You will be surprised to watch how low people can go just to earn quite a low rate. He is part of the problem that is driven prices for professional photography down. I have used to work and seen invoices from professional studios that do not offer any real estate photos, just business photography. Their bills are $2000-$4000/day and businesses are paying them. I am sure it will degrade too with companies such a Snappr but at least they are getting paid very well for delivering professional photos, can tolerate longer travel time and even delays caused by their clients. At $100/shoot even when everything is perfect it is still nothing. |
||
Post 11 IP flag post |
WGAN Fan Club Member Buffalo, New York |
GETMYVR private msg quote post Address this user | |
@Wingman you're exactly right in your last thread comment. We're producing content worth thousands of dollars, and as soon as we get rid of the race to the bottom like car dealer mentality, we will be so much better off. This is an exceptional group of professionals, and I feel very fortunate to be associated with you all. |
||
Post 12 IP flag post |
WGAN Fan CLUB Member Coeur d'Alene, Idaho |
lilnitsch private msg quote post Address this user | |
@Wingman I have a $300 minimum to show up my average shoots hover around $500 ~ I have $3900 worth of scheduled shoots this week. While, it is still a job, it does pay decently |
||
Post 13 IP flag post |
WGAN Fan Club Member Queensland, Australia |
Wingman private msg quote post Address this user | |
Quote:Originally Posted by lilnitsch $300 vs $100 is a huge difference. I charge the same in numbers for property photos but mine is in AUD and it is workable even with delays. At the end of the day even if it is complex, starting late than scheduled and takes 3 hours with travel to/back and editing I can do two a day and it is very good money worth running it as a full time business. Drop it to $100, consider fuel for travelling about 80-100km a day and it is simply a job paid at the same rate as an entry job for a school leaver with no skills. And being cheap does not mean you will get all jobs, you will be still looking for them.. so dropping your rates so low won't make your business very profitable. To me it is like a dead loop these cheap photographers are putting themselves in |
||
Post 14 IP flag post |
WGAN Fan Club Member Buffalo, New York |
GETMYVR private msg quote post Address this user | |
Consider the listing agent that hired you for the $500,000 property. When it sells they're almost guaranteed $15,000 in commission, for the 3% listing commission. Almost 100% of my jobs are for photographs and then VR tours possibly. I've said this in other posts, those images are what drive activity which drives opportunity which creates success. The universe will deliver very fair pay for all of us I promise. I'm not interested in cheap customers, please call somebody else, I'm looking for partners in success. What I create. | ||
Post 15 IP flag post |
WGAN Forum Founder & WGAN-TV Podcast Host Atlanta, Georgia |
DanSmigrod private msg quote post Address this user | |
WGAN Free Service: Text Me 5 Minutes Before WGAN-TV is Live WGAN-TV Live at 5: How Photographers Can Resist Zillow’s Threat To Monopolize Real Estate Hi All, After reading this blog post (reprinted in the WGAN Forum with the permission of the author) ... ✓ How Photographers can Resist Zillow's Threat to Monopolize Real Estate ... I invited the author, HomeJab Founder and Owner Joe Jesuele, to be my guest on WGAN-TV Live at 5 on Thursday, 2 September 2021 to discuss this topic. What questions should I ask Joe during the show? Feel free to post in this WGAN Forum discussion on continue the lively discussion going on here. Enjoy your weekend, Dan P.S. Reminder that this show is today - Thursday, 2 September 2021 at 5 pm EDT. |
||
Post 16 IP flag post |
WGAN Forum Founder & WGAN-TV Podcast Host Atlanta, Georgia |
DanSmigrod private msg quote post Address this user | |
@lilnitsch @GETMYVR @Dataventurer @Wingman Questions that I should ask on today's (Thursday, 2 September 2021) show: ✓ How Photographers can Resist Zillow's Threat to Monopolize Real Estate Dan |
||
Post 17 IP flag post |
WGAN Fan Club Member Gilroy, California |
Dataventurer private msg quote post Address this user | |
@DanSmigrod I signed up with HomeJab after you had posted the article at the top of this thread 2 months ago. Compared to Snappr, their onboarding process was simpler (no Zoom interview required). The HomeJab platform does not seem as mature as the Snappr platform. Dan, I think for your audience here, the main question from members would be around quantifying the potential income opportunity from working with HomeJab. They are located in Pennsylvania. I haven't hear boo from them in the past two months (I'm in northern California). Their initial reply after they accepted my application was "we'll contact you when we have a requirement", indicating that they weren't particularly seeking photographers to meet requirements in areas where they were seeing growth, just at this point collecting a stable of service providers. I'd press during your interview today for some details about where their hot spots are in the country. What kind of numbers are they seeing regarding the different categories of photography? Where is the thrust of their marketing efforts to enterprise clients? These kinds of details would provide a basis for deciding if it's worth the time to engage with their platform. Thank you for your efforts to maximize the opportunity from your interview today for your members! |
||
Post 18 IP flag post |
WGAN Forum Founder & WGAN-TV Podcast Host Atlanta, Georgia |
DanSmigrod private msg quote post Address this user | |
@Dataventurer I can introduce you to the founder via email tomorrow (Friday), if you like, about the potential for gigs in your area. Today's WGAN-TV Live at 5 topic: How Photographers Can Resist Zillow’s Threat To Monopolize Real Estate Dan |
||
Post 19 IP flag post |
WGAN Fan Club Member Gilroy, California |
Dataventurer private msg quote post Address this user | |
@DanSmigrod Wow! Thanks for the offer! Tell him I would be happy to share some comparative experience so far with Snappr. Dave |
||
Post 20 IP flag post |
WGAN Forum Founder & WGAN-TV Podcast Host Atlanta, Georgia |
DanSmigrod private msg quote post Address this user | |
116-WGAN-TV | How Photographers can Resist Zillow’s Threat to Monopolize Real Estate with HomeJab Founder and Owner Joe Jesuele | Aired: Thursday, 2 September 2021 | ||
Post 21 IP flag post |
WGAN Forum Founder & WGAN-TV Podcast Host Atlanta, Georgia |
DanSmigrod private msg quote post Address this user | |
Hi All, From this WGAN Forum discussion: ✓ Transcript>How Photogs can Resist Zillow's Threat to Monopolize Real Estate Quote: Originally Posted by @Dataventurer |
||
Post 22 IP flag post |
Pages:
1This topic is archived. Start new topic?