Do you charge less for shooting Matterport with a Ricoh Theta Z1 than Pro2?13025
Pages:
1
 WGAN ForumFounder & WGAN-TV Podcast Host Atlanta, Georgia |
DanSmigrod private msg quote post Address this user | |
| Hi All, Do you charge your customer less when you use the Z1 vs Matterport camera? If so, about what % less, you don't have to give me your $ amount, just a ball park %. I noticed this question in a related WGAN Forum discussion: Quote: Originally Posted by @Ghagendorf Thanks, Dan |
||
| Post 1 • IP flag post | ||
|
WGAN Forum Founder & WGAN-TV Podcast Host Atlanta, Georgia |
DanSmigrod private msg quote post Address this user | |
Quote:Originally Posted by @JonJ |
||
| Post 2 • IP flag post | ||
|
Eladitems private msg quote post Address this user | |
| Why would you charge less? They are paying for the platform not the camera | ||
| Post 3 • IP flag post | ||
|
HarlanHambright private msg quote post Address this user | |
| And I'd like to charge MORE for the Z1 as it takes longer when you add the run and hide time. god I wish matterport would implement time shift. | ||
| Post 4 • IP flag post | ||
|
|
HarlanHambright private msg quote post Address this user | |
 and here's that top image with 15 seconds of photoshop added to it. |
||
| Post 5 • IP flag post | ||
|
JonJ private msg quote post Address this user | |
Quote:Originally Posted by HarlanHambright @HarlanHambright, Thank you for the Photoshop assist! Care to venture a guess which one was the cell phone photo? |
||
| Post 6 • IP flag post | ||
|
|
HarlanHambright private msg quote post Address this user | |
| I’m guessing the top one but nothing surprises my anymore. I’ve made some 44”x 5 feet prints from iPhone images that looked very nice. | ||
| Post 7 • IP flag post | ||
|
coulee360 private msg quote post Address this user | |
| @Eladitems The quality of the tour in my opinion is why to charge less say for the theta or onex. I've done a comparison of them and don't like the poor quality I've seen locally of the one x (i even did a test with mine) and even locally in my area of a new competitor only using a theta. My quality with my MP1 beats them out of the water. If I were to offer one x tours I would charge less because the quality is less. BUT I wont be offering it because that quality at the end of the day reflects on me. I dont want to put out poor quality tours. |
||
| Post 8 • IP flag post | ||
|
|
Eladitems private msg quote post Address this user | |
| @coulee360 not at all. I use the Z1 and quality is very close. Agents don’t care. They care about the features I like better the Z1. Easier to scan. No alignment issues. Outdoor scanning is so much easier. |
||
| Post 9 • IP flag post | ||
 WGAN StandardMember Las Vegas |
VTLV private msg quote post Address this user | |
| I can wrap my head around charging less For another use. If you have a classic plan, you’re putting up to $39 for upload using dual fisheye lens. Your monthly plans still need to help with costs to fund your tour slot plus other slots not currently being used. You use a pro 1 or 2, you’re out a few hours of shooting time. It’s right there with charge more for pro2 vs pro1 price comparison a couple years ago. Fund the plan, compete with the 2020 new 360 photographers, Matterport Partners and the bottom of the barrel photographers banking on volume. |
||
| Post 10 • IP flag post | ||
Pages:
1This topic is archived. Start new topic?