Recommendations for a high spec video small mirrorless camera12711
Pages:
1
|
Letsshoot private msg quote post Address this user | |
| Hi, I currently have two Nikon D750's which I use primarily for photography. I want to do real estate video. I would find a D750 plus a 16-35mm lens + gimbal too heavy to be carrying for any length of time. I'm looking to buy a 2nd hand mirrorless camera with high video specs, great AF,good dynamic range and a model that performs well at higher iso's and considerably lighter. (The D750 is 840g without lens). I was looking at Fuji XT-3/Sony A7III. Not interested in Nikon mirrorless but if you have any other recommendations please let me know. Thank you.  |
||
| Post 1 • IP flag post | ||
|
Virtual_Homey private msg quote post Address this user | |
| I own a Sony a7riii and love it. | ||
| Post 2 • IP flag post | ||
 WGANStandard Member New York City |
3dVuz private msg quote post Address this user | |
| I bought the z6 and get the benefit of using with my existing lenses | ||
| Post 3 • IP flag post | ||
|
homefrontphoto private msg quote post Address this user | |
| I use an old Sony A6000 (can be had for <$300 on ebay) with a good wide angle lens. It does an awesome job for video. If you want to spend more for the body the A6600 should give you better dynamic range. But I've been happy with the A6000. | ||
| Post 4 • IP flag post | ||
|
|
Letsshoot private msg quote post Address this user | |
| @virtual_Homey Thanks for the feedback, in low light what iso would you be able to shoot with your A7rIII at without too much noise for video? In other words the video is useable. @3dVuz Thank you, I'm looking for a much lighter setup, my Nikon F mount lenses are very heavy so I just thought I check out another system. |
||
| Post 5 • IP flag post | ||
|
ironwills private msg quote post Address this user | |
| I am using the Fuji X-T3 with a 10-24mm on a Ronin SC and I find it a great set up. I mostly shoot in HD and my ISO is usually around 800 sometimes bumping to 2500 and it is still totally usable. The lens I mentioned is an f/4, which keeps it light, but means I have to play with ISO a lot. That being said I have also used the Sony A7111 and it is a great camera as well with better specs. I just found the Fuji system more intuitive (and I came from Nikon as well) Here is a house I shot last week all with the Fuji X-T3 - https://vimeo.com/442895686 |
||
| Post 6 • IP flag post | ||
|
|
PaulM private msg quote post Address this user | |
| Definately Sony, I shoot Panasonic and have too much investment ot change but for the purpose you mention - Sony | ||
| Post 7 • IP flag post | ||
|
|
JonPaul private msg quote post Address this user | |
| For purely video, you can't beat the recently announced Sony A7S3. 4k 120 would be great, however for stills, its only a 12mp camera, so not sure if that would cut it. You could always get an A73 to pair with it, which is an excellent low light camera. Then you could invest in lenses that would work on both. A73's have come way down in price and I use one as my back-up camera, and sometimes my main. |
||
| Post 8 • IP flag post | ||
|
|
Letsshoot private msg quote post Address this user | |
| Thanks everyone for the feedback. I think I will go with Sony. | ||
| Post 9 • IP flag post | ||
Pages:
1This topic is archived. Start new topic?